
....... 
Performance Data and Geometry
Pattern and VSWR
Download as File
Stacking
Modified 2 m Version Website
Modified DL7KM Beam for the 70cm Band with Double Quad Driven Element
The DL7KM beam has a fan community on its own. Among those are a number of contesters.
I became curious about what would be in this design.
How good is the DL7KM Beam?
• R. Bertelsmeier, DJ9BV: "Gain and Performance Data of 432 MHz Antennas (Leistungsdaten
von 432 MHz Antennen)", Dubus 1989: Rainer attested the 70 cm version a forward gain of
9.75 dBD (11.90 dBi) only. But that is due to "badly mistuned directors, because of
wrong scaling from the 2 m version. Cutting all elements will increase gain to 12.0 dBD,
which is also low for this size."
See details and whole theory on the website revising the 2 m band version
The outcome of the simulation of the 2 m Band version made me think about a redesign for the 2 m and 70 cm band immediately.
About the Design modification
After setting up a NEC model and looking at the output with barely 12 dBD I decided
to do a redesign that a build of the original beam can be adapted to. The outcome covers the
full 70 cm band with a very low SWR and delivers consistant gain over 431 to 435 MHz dropping by only 0.1 dB
towards 440 MHz. Same time it delivers at least 1 dB more gain and much less Antenna Temperature thanks to
a much cleaner pattern.
Modified design with small inner structure
I elemininated one element from the wave guiding structure each, spread the remaining ones more sensibly over the boom length,
modified their lengths, moved the reflectors closer in, and added three inner directing elements 
which play a major role in tying up the beams pattern.
Performance Data of original and modified Design
Mod. YBN
Gain vs. isotr. Rad. 14.8 dBi with corrected AG
Gain vs. Dipole 12.6 dBD
3 dB Hplane 33.3 deg.
3 dB Eplane 37.4 deg.
F/B 20.3 dB
F/R 20.3 dB
Impedance 50 ohms
VSWR Band Width <1.1:1 on complete band
Mechan. Length 1314 mm
Electr. Length 1.89 λ
Geometry of the modified design
NEC wires segmented at 1050 MHz; feedpoint = zero on z axis
No BC, no SBC given yet. Boomless numbers as used in the NEC file only.
Positions zero is counting from original reflectos position as "0" on. The new reflectors are moved
up front by 23 mm against their original position. Built DL7KM Beams can be adapted to the
modification; the double booms spacing is with 400 mm similar to the original design.
For the given below measures elements are of Ø 6 mm, Quad loops are Ø 5 mm.
Due to the rectangular, loop style driver I suggest no SBC here. The common BC must
meet the way your elements shall be fastened. Find BC numbers on my BCpage
8 mm elements  upper and lower boom
Refl. DE D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7
Pos. 23 153 273 372 517 707 920 1134 1314 mm
Lgth. 348  290 289 286 284 280 276 271 mm
8 mm elements  short center boom
Refl. DE D1 D2 D3
Pos. 23 153 279 383 523 mm
Lgth. 352  283 283 277 mm
Note: element lengths for Ø 6 mm almost fit 1/4" too, subtract 0.5 mm for the Imperial measure.
The Double Quads wire diameter is 5 mm. The loops side lengths are 175.4 mm in NEC  which is mid wire  pus half wire thickness gives us
outer side lengths of 177.9 mm each, a total height of 495 mm and a space of 10 ... 12 mm at the centered feedpoint.
Pattern and VSWR Plots of the modified design
Elevation and Azimuth plot on 432.2 MHz
RL and SWR plot  simulated
Gain, F/B and F/R plot  simulated
Downloads
EZNEC file of the modified DL7KM Beam
Stacking the modified DL7KM Beam
Stacking Dist. DL6WU Formula
toptobottom (Hplane) 1.21 m or 3.97 ft ✶
sidebyside (Eplane) 1.08 m or 3.55 ft✶
(✶) = for center of antennas ie. in the middle point between the booms
A 4 bay of modified DL7KM Beams at distances per DL6WU formula, gain = 20.7 dBi or 18.6 dBD
Note the unusual appearance of the stack. With the pattern being more wide in azimuth pattern the
used to view of a stacked Yagi bay is like reversed or tilted by 90 degrees here.
Explanation: Due to showing wider elevation patterns half power beam width (HPBW) angle than azimuth HPBW the ordinary 'single boom' Yagi
is stacked with larger width than height. While the DL7KM beam is a '2 layer' stacked array in itself already. And the
modified DL7KM beam shows 3 layers that bundle the pattern in elevation already. Hence we find a 'reverse' ratio of stacking width
and height against what we know as common appearence of stacked single layer Yagis.
Stacking Scheme
And a screenshot from the analysis of the Far Field Table with TANT by YT1NT
Not too bad. Comparing with entries in the 432 MHz VE7BQH G/T Table we find that it takes a 4 bay of narrow band width 11 ele. Yagis
of 2.8 wl eletrical length or 1.9 m boom to beat this result.
And that will only happen in the dry. With the very wide band width of the mod. DL7KM Beam you can be pretty certain to obtain this performance uneffected
even with completely wet antennas.
But ... we need to run an Average Gain Correction on this, as with real losses the AG is at 0.998 or 99.8 percent radiated power found in the pattern
against fed in power. So that results will have to be corrected downwards by a few 10th of dBs.
73, Hartmut, DG7YBN

