• Main Page
 • Home
• Antennas
 • 144 MHz
 YBN 22w
A 50 ohms direct feed 2 ele. Yagi with high potential
as broad beam Contest Stack. See yourself and compare to DJ9HO Double Quads and 7ZB Oblongs. Full details on 2 and 4 Yagi
stacks are given 3D Pattern of 4 x Stack
 YBN 25m (58)
1.6 m high F/R, good willing 50 ohms
direct feed Yagi as introduced with bent DE short version of the 58 in Dubus 4/2012 Elevation Plot
 YBN 28m (58)
3.6 m nice G/T, good willing 50 ohms
direct feed Yagi as introduced with bent DE expanded version of the 58 in Dubus 4/2012
Actually it seems to be so good that DK7ZB decided to use it as draft for the 8 ele. OWM he just published.
Elevation Plot
 YBN 210w (58)
5 m wide band, good willing 50 ohms
direct feed Yagi as introduced with straight DE expanded version of the 58 in Dubus 4/2012
Elevation Plot
 GTV 26m
2.4 m moderate band width version of the low impedance, yet 50 ohms
direct feed Low Noise Yagi with bent DE introduced in Dubus 1/2013 Elevation Plot
 GTV 27n
3.1 m narrow band, max. G/T version of the low impedance, yet 50 ohms
direct feed Low Noise Yagi with bent DE introduced in Dubus 1/2013 Elevation Plot
 GTV 28w
3.7 m wideband, still good G/T and nice F/B version of the low impedance, yet 50 ohms
direct feed Low Noise Yagi with bent DE introduced in Dubus 1/2013 Elevation Plot
 GTV 28n
3.8 m narrow band, max. G/T version of the low impedance, yet 50 ohms
direct feed Low Noise Yagi with bent DE introduced in Dubus 1/2013 Elevation Plot
 GTV 29n
4.3 m narrow band, balanced between low Antenna Temp. and G/T version of the low impedance, yet 50 ohms
direct feed Low Noise Yagi with bent DE introduced in Dubus 1/2013 Elevation Plot
 GTV 29m
4.5 m moderate band width, low Antenna Temp. version of the low impedance, yet 50 ohms
direct feed Low Noise Yagi with bent DE introduced in Dubus 1/2013 Elevation Plot
 YBN 210w 12.5 Ω
5.1 m  144.0 to 144.8 MHz wide band 12 ohms OWLstyle
Low Noise Yagi with straight DE and very low back lobes only Elevation Plot
 GTV 210LT
5.1 m moderate band width, lowest Antenna Temp. version of the low impedance, yet 50 ohms
direct feed Low Noise Yagi with bent DE introduced in Dubus 1/2013 Elevation Plot
 GTV 211LT
6.0 m moderate band width, lowest Antenna Temp. version of the low impedance, yet 50 ohms
direct feed Low Noise Yagi with bent DE introduced in Dubus 1/2013 Elevation Plot
 YBN 212w 12.5 Ω
6.8 m wide band 12 ohms OWLstyle
Low Noise Yagi with straight DE and very low back lobes only Azimuth Plot:
 GTV 212m mk2
Improved 6.8 m version of the low impedance, yet 50 ohms
direct feed Low Noise Yagi with bent DE introduced in Dubus 1/2013 Elevation Plot:
 GTV 212n
6.8 m narrow band version of the low impedance, yet 50 ohms
direct feed Low Noise Yagi with bent DE introduced in Dubus 1/2013 Elevation Plot:
 GTV 214w
8.4 m version of the low impedance, yet 50 ohms
direct feed Low Noise Yagi with bent DE introduced in Dubus 1/2013 Elevation Plot
 GTV 216w
10 m version of the low impedance, yet 50 ohms
direct feed Low Noise Yagi with bent DE introduced in Dubus 1/2013 Elevation Plot
 GTV 219m
12.4 m version of the low impedance, yet 50 ohms
direct feed Low Noise Yagi with bent DE introduced in Dubus 1/2013 Elevation Plot

....... 
Performance Data and Geometry
Pattern and VSWR
Download as File
Stacking
Modified 70 cm Version Website
Simulating the DL7KM Beam with Double Quad Driven Element
The DL7KM beam has a fan community on its own. Among those are a number of contesters.
I became curious about what would be in this design.
How good is the DL7KM Beam?  Some sources that report about its gain:
• K. Weiner, DJ9HO, UHF Unterlage, 1980: E.4.5.2 Der DoppelquadBeam mit G = 15dB, (Engl.: UHF Compendium; The twinquad beam on 2m)
acc. to DL7KM  Gain = 15 dBD, HPBW = 33.5 / 30.2 degr, F/B approx. 25 dB
• A. Krische, DJ0TR, Rothammels Antennenbuch, 2013, : Gain ≥ 13 dBD, F/B approx. 25 dB, HPBW = 35 / 32 degr
• R. Bertelsmeier, DJ9BV: "Gain and Performance Data of 432 MHz Antennas (Leistungsdaten
von 432 MHz Antennen)", Dubus 1989: Rainer attested the 70 cm version a forward gain of
9.75 dBD (11.90 dBi) only. But that is due to "badly mistuned directors, because of
wrong scaling from the 2 m version. Cutting all elements will increase gain to 12.0 dBD,
which is also low for this size."
Setting gain numbers of up to 15 dB over a dipole, that the DL7KM Beam is quoted with, in relations to RF physics:
At an identical boom length a single top ranking narrow band Yagis in the G/T List produces around 13.6 dBi. A pair of these Yagis needs to be
stacked at a distance of 2.7 m to yield an additional theoretical gain of max. +3.0 dB. This is the spacing according the well proven
DL6WU formula and we have not taken into account any phasing line losses.
Summed up ... for a set of two sound Yagis of same length as the DL7KM Beam we can expect 16.6 dBi or scraping a
14.5 dBD in an optimistic view. And this with a significantly larger effective aperture area covered by a
twined top today design. This said, it is quite unlikely for the DL7KM Beam to reach even that 14.5 dBD, with
just less then half of stacking distance between the two booms. At that close distance of 1200 mm or 0.58 wl
the twin booms of the DL7KM Beam are apart
a typical stacking gain is just 1.4 dB. Which would leave our pair of closely stacked Yagis at 15.0 dBi or approximately 12.9 dBD.
Which makes a contrast to the fabulous 15 dBD we see quoted here and there for the DL7KM Beam.
Original design
Gearing up ... with first simulated patterns at hand I immediately wished for a better pattern, as it
is commonly understood that under stacking leads to very clean patterns basically:
Original DL7KM Beam (blue line) vs. anticipated modified design (black)
Simulated elevation and azimuth plots
Design modification
After setting up a NEC model and looking at the output with barely 12 dBD I decided
to do a redesign that a build of the original beam can be adapted to. The outcome covers the
full 2 m bandwith very low SWR and delivers consistant gain over the 2 MHz stretch. Same
time it delivers at least 1 dB more gain and much less Antenna Temperature.
Modified design with small inner structure
I elemininated one element from the wave guiding structure each, spread the remaining ones more sensibly over the boom length,
modified their lengths, moved the reflectors closer in, and added three inner directing elements 
which play a major role in tying up the beams pattern.
Performance Data of original and modified Design
Orig. DL7KM Mod. YBN
Gain vs. isotr. Rad. 13.3 dBi* 14.8 dBi**
Gain vs. Dipole 11.2 dBD* 12.6 dBD
3 dB Hplane 29.6 deg. 33.5 deg.
3 dB Eplane 35.2 deg. 37.2 deg.
F/B 22.2 dB 20.8 dB
F/R 14.9 dB 20.8 dB
Impedance 60 ohms 50 ohms
VSWR Band Width 1.3?:1*** 1.03:1***
Mechan. Length 3970 mm 3940 mm
Electr. Length 1.91 λ 1.89 λ
Corrected Average Gain Data for the single beam
(using 13.31 dBi of the orig. design)
T_loss 4.5 K 2.5 K
Antenna Temp. 313 K 235.5 K
G/T (single ant.) 11.25 dB 8.94 dB
*) Due to the Double Quad exciter and a little uncertainty caused by unknown BC for mounting elements directly
conductive onto a 15 x 15 mm boom (as proposed by DL7KM in the UHF Compendium) the actual element length for the
NEC model is not clear for the last 1 or 2 mm. The gain I quote for the original DL7KM Beam is an optimistic one
because of all the challenges the design model holds for even the ambitioned NEC modeller.
Given that the Design was developed on an experimental base pre 1980 a BC is 'build in'. I have subtracted 3/4 of the BC that
DL6WU gives for conductive through boom builds here.
**) 14.92 dBi at an Average Gain of 1.025 for the lossy model and 14.96 dBi at an AG of 1.034 for the lossless model.
With AG correction per KF2YN applied the remaining gain is 14.78 dBi or 12.63 dBD.
***) as in VE7BQH G/T table = at 145.00 MHz
The Half Power Beam Width of the original design might suggest more gain then there is in it. Which is due to the
unusual pattern characteristic compared to ordinary Yagi designs. Thus we meet a quite different form factor
η_loss for the standard equation for effective area and gain:
With G(loss) = numeric gain including losses on wires. As the equivalent to multiplying the capture area A with η_loss
on the other side of the equation. We produce G(loss) "automatically" when measuring a real Yagi or simulating with right
choice of wire material; where we name it "G" or "Gain" only. Which is not the urging issue here, but explains the formula to extend.
With a Yagi structure, same efficiency provided, and one time stacked to 1.2 m and on the other hand stacked to 2.7 m we yield quite
a difference in the effective area Aeff. An thus in the gain number too.
Geometry of the modified design
No BC, no SBC given yet. Boomless numbers as used in the NEC file only.
Positions zero is counting from original reflectos position as "0" on. The new reflectors are moved
up front by 70 mm against their original position. Built DL7KM Beams can be adapted to the
modification; the double booms spacing is with 1200 mm similar to the original design, as
the Double Quad Loop is.
For the given below measures elements are of Ø 8 mm, Quad loops are Ø 5 mm.
Due to the rectangular, loop style driver I suggest no SBC here. The common BC must
meet the way your elements shall be fastened. Find BC numbers on my BCpage
An interesting detail is the D1 which is shorter than D2 and D3. This is not a typo in the table below.
As well as all the parasitic elements seem quite short for a 144 MHz structure. Which is all due to the
mutual coupling between the two largely understacked booms.
Update 20141231, corr. length of D1
8 mm elements  upper and lower boom
Refl. DE D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7
Pos. 70 460 805 1115 1550 2120 2760 3400 3940 mm
Lgth. 1044  896 898 890 884 872 868 856 mm
8 mm elements  short center boom
Refl. DE D1 D2 D3
Pos. 70 460 830 1150 1570 mm
Lgth. 1056  884 878 868 mm
Note: element lengths for Ø 8 mm fit 5/16" too
The Double Quads wire diameter is 5 mm. Circumfence of the loops and all measures identical with the original DL7KM Beam.
Which are identical side lengths of 520 mm each, a total height of 1470 mm and a space of 20 mm at the centered feedpoint.
MNI tnx to Vladimir, UR5EAZ who sorted this website and .ez files for bugs and more
Pattern and VSWR Plots of the modified design
Elevation and Azimuth plot at 144.1 MHz
RL and SWR plot  simulated
Gain, F/B and F/R plot  simulated
Downloads
EZNEC file of the modified DL7KM Beam
Stacking the modified DL7KM Beam
Stacking Dist. DL6WU Formula
toptobottom (HPlane) 3.61 m or 11.8 ft ✶
sidebyside (EPlane) 3.25 m or 10.7 ft ✶
(✶) = for centre of antennas ie. in the middle point between the booms
A 4 bay of modified DL7KM Beams at distances per DL6WU formula, gain = 20.7 dBi or 18.6 dBD
Note the unusual appearance of the stack. With the pattern being more wide in azimuth pattern the
used to view of a stacked Yagi bay is like reversed or tilted by 90 degrees here.
Explanation: Due to showing wider elevation patterns half power beam width (HPBW) angle than azimuth HPBW the ordinary 'single boom' Yagi
is stacked with larger width than height. While the DL7KM beam is a '2 layer' stacked array in itself already. And the
modified DL7KM beam shows 3 layers that bundle the pattern in elevation already. Hence we find a 'reverse' ratio of stacking width
and height against what we know as common appearence of stacked single layer Yagis.
2 modified DL7KM Beams sidebyside, gain = 17.87 dBi or 15.72 dBD
3D pattern of 2 x modified DL7KM Beam sidebyside (4NEC2)
Modfied DL7KM Beam as a 4 Bay
Stacking Scheme
Elevation and Azimuth plot at 144.1 MHz
73, Hartmut, DG7YBN

